That was the argument used by my SNP chum to expose my views
on Scottish nationalism. My views were invalid because I never made it in
Scottish rugby.
The next attack was on my age and, bizarrely, my pubescence.
My views, my beliefs, are not valid because I am 19 and therefore not fully
pubescent. I was quite game for sending a photo at this point and letting my
nationalist pal judge for himself whether I was pubescent enough to hold views
on the subject.
I was told that I have never worked and my views are
therefore invalid. I have indeed worked.
My views, my beliefs, are also invalid because I have never “paid
taxes, had a mortgage, domestic bills, been responsible for others welfare...”
I wasn’t aware that my thoughts on Scottish nationalism would only become valid
at a certain age and after fitting several criteria.
Given that most 19 year olds have not fulfilled these
obligations, perhaps they shouldn’t be allowed a vote. Or maybe they should be
allowed a vote, heck let’s give it to 16 year olds too, but no one under the
age of, say, 25 should be allowed any views.
I questioned whether 19 year old SNP members would be
allowed any views. 19 year old SNP members do have a massive advantage over me,
of course – they’re in the right and I am simply wrong.
So I’ll be spending the rest of the afternoon trying to get
better at rugby – maybe by tea-time my tackling will have improved enough to
validate my right to have views on certain subjects. Maybe I’ll be closer to
adulthood by that point and be better endowed and it will become okay to hold
views, even if others disagree with them.
I can’t wait till I’m all grown up.
Maybe it was just that photo he was after all along. One never knows.
ReplyDelete